Author’s proof

The question is whether the author’s proof sufficient guarantee against the proof-distortion?
Author’s proof is fundamentally quite different than ordinary proofreading. Therefore, the results of the proof, kept by the author, are somewhat different. Author reads his work, the text of which he creatively interested. Therefore, the attention paid to it is not there, where to direct the attention of professional proofreader. The author is not to inverted or marashek. He distinguishes them only when they caught him in the eye, and he himself is not looking for them.

In addition, the author reads him well familiar text. He did not need to read carefully the words to read print. The words themselves come to mind when looking at the proofs. From this the author correctly typed in a wrong reading. However, there are otherwise. The author believes is almost always unnecessary appeal to the original. Meanwhile, the case that he does not remember what was written by him, and straightening the type error, rather than to return to the correct reading, but even more removed from the original text, sometimes breaking the sense of forgetfulness. These “authorized” error is not so rare, and show that to the guidance of the author, especially when he plays the role of non-relevant corrector should be treated critically. Learn more about online proofreading service.

We should also add that it is psychologically difficult to pay attention to typed text correction applied patches. Corrections are accepted on faith, without verification. Blunders corrector escape the attention of the author. That is why it is useful not to proofread the imprint, the Management Board is a proofreader, and net duplicate, and then move back to proofreading proofreading copy all changes. With this transfer of the proof-of edits they will be revised by the author and does not elude his notice.

There is one more feature of the author’s proofs, which causes constant clashes authors with publishers – it’s tendency to “break” the proofs, that is to expose the typed text radical changes. For the author of proof is to some extent one of the stages of the creative process. The author can not resist not to extend the work on a piece, no matter what stage of completeness is located. Naturally, the publishers are struggling with this trend, the authors greatly increases the cost of publication. But, apart from the business side, this leads to the breaking of that serviceability text from her only suffering. It is therefore desirable that the original trade-in print, was brought to the final stage of completion, and no changes in the text unless absolutely necessary proofs have been made.

All this shows that the author – always a bad proofreader. Even if he is a professional, proofreader, proofreading in his own work he has done a lot of mistakes and missed a lot of typos.

That’s why in addition to the author should have an editor who can work as a critical test of the corrector and the author, subject, of course, a somewhat broader philological outlook than normal among proofreaders.